Thursday, December 06, 2007
Top Ten Bad Books Everybody Has to Read
2 comments:
You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:
1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.
The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.
Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.
I've only read "Frankenstein." Who says older English has to be (undeservedly) unpopular? Then again, I have had a few years of Latin, so it's easy by comparison...
ReplyDeleteHannah J,
ReplyDeleteI don't think the author intended to indict Shelley's book because it is old, just because, in his opinion, it isn't well-written.
While I agree that a book can't be said to be badly written simply because it is old, I would also argue that it can't be considered to be well-written because it is old.
Try reading Lew Wallace's "Ben Hur" for example. I made that mistake one time. I also remember trying to read "Five Little Peppers and How they Grew" for my kids. Now this is a book that is well-regarded as a children's book, but after trying to read it to my kids, I had to conclude that its reputation must have been based on the historic significance of the book rather than its literary quality. I simply had to stop in the middle and go to another book.
Old books are like new ones in this respect: some are well-written and some are not. Fortunately, you have a better chance of finding a well-written old one, probably because only the better written ones stood the test of time.