Tuesday, February 12, 2008
What is it about Flannery O'Connor?
I have a class of high school seniors this year who are all very intelligent students, but most of them are the type who are concerned with getting through the program with A's rather than with viscerally engaging in the material we are reading. So I decided to give them a dose of Flannery. We read "Good Country People," one of my favorites. As soon as we started, they focused like a laser beam--for the first time this year. It was really astounding.
What is it about her that prompts this reaction? I notice two things.
Her impact, I think, first derives from her approach to both life and literature, which is the idea that both are incarnational. Her fiction might correctly be characterized as theological embodiment. There is no abstraction in her writing: it is all gritty, concrete, sometimes obscene reality. And although there is no preaching in her writing, all her writings are embodied sermons. She understood, with Aristotle and St. Thomas, that you get to the abstract through the concrete, not vice-versa. Compared to the characters encountered in O'Connor, the characters of most other authors are as ghosts, and the events mere fantastic dreams.
A reader of Flannery O'Connor encounters persons and things, and all the theological significance comes through them and them alone.
In addition to the concreteness of her writing is the starkness of the characters and the events she relates. I was talking to Wendell Berry about this one time and he said, "Yeah. She hits you with both crutches." Indeed. An O'Connor reader will be fascinated or repelled, but they cannot be indifferent. Her prose does not accomodate the lukewarm.
I could say more, but anything more I could say has been better said by Robert Wilkins in a recent post on his blog.
4 comments:
You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:
1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.
The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.
Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.
Thanks for reminding me that O'Connor is a genius. And thanks for reminding me that another genius--Wendell Berry--walks through our hallway at school every week. I think that little drop in from him is almost as powerful as O'Connor's stories.
ReplyDeleteO'Connor has been one of my favorite authors, too. Doing several research papers on her short stories opened my eyes to the tremendous amount of analysis this one woman has received.
ReplyDeleteFlannery O'Connor..A cripple, a freak and a reclusive loser walk into a church..and make sense of the absurd, and beautify the un-adorned.
ReplyDeleteI believe she touches on a little something called the sublime. Ever heard of it? Wait, who taught me about that?
ReplyDelete-Ben Hughes