This is the very interesting finding reported by Susan Pinker in The Sexual Paradox. She is specifically studying the problem that got Laurence Summers into so much undeserved trouble: why are there many fewer women than men at the highest levels of math, science, and engineering? Her answer: when given the choice, women with high aptitude for math, science, and engineering are more likely than similarly gifted men to choose something else.The oughta' be a law.
Saturday, February 14, 2009
Trouble in Gender Equality Paradise
2 comments:
You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:
1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.
The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.
Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.
The link to http://gruntledcenter.blogspot.com/2009/02/more-choice-women-have-more-they.html may have broken.
ReplyDeleteTo me, this makes perfect sense, but then again, I don't have an ideological requirement forcing me to believe that men and women can't be different.
ReplyDeleteIt is not unusual to find boys who are lopsidedly good at math and science, and humdrum at English and the humanities. Girls who are good at math, on the other hand, tend to be good at all of their studies. This fact is reflected in the SAT scores.
Women, in other words, tend to have more options. Little surprise, then, that they tend to take other options more readily.