Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Piers Morgan loses it in debate with gun rights advocate
At the end of the interview, he gave the unflappable Pratt a parting insult, and Pratt simply smiled and congratulated Piers on his substantive contributions to the discussion, at which point Piers went off again.
The media has now painted its face and is on the warpath against guns--and completely ignoring its own contribution to violence in America caused by violent movies, television programming, and video games.
Piers, of course, had nothing to say about these.
5 comments:
You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:
1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.
The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.
Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.
How dare you not realize that the First Amendment is ABSOLUTE. As for that Brit Twit Morgan, if your national tv audience is measured in the hundreds, then perhaps shouting is in order.
ReplyDeleteMorgan claims that the US has "by far the worst rate of gun murder, of gun crime, of any of the civilized countries of this world." It appears, then, that he doesn't regard Jamaica and South Africa as "civilized countries." So how does he explain that that *isn't* racist?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSaw the interview. Morgan fulminates like a Southern Baptist preacher in a Revival tent.
ReplyDeleteLiberals talk a lot about separating politics and religion, but, ironically, government is the religion of liberals. They see their attitude as new and enlightened. Truth is, all sorts of ancient regimes conflated the two. Rulers from the Egyptian pharoahs to the Roman emperors wanted to be worshiped by their people.
I remember in history class how the teacher and the textbook were so amused when talking about the "divine right of kings" doctrine in the Middle Ages. Aren't those Christians silly?
But I see that as an improvement. The ruler was ordained by God is an improvement over the ruler is God.
Unless you're Evan "Obama is like God" Thomas.
Loans A 100% private guarantee of 3,000 euros has 90,000,000 euros. Serbia; Montenegro; Zurich; German; Croatia; Slovenia; The Netherlands; Bosnia; The German
ReplyDeleteloan without a guarantor
loan from banks
Housing loan
Cash loans
Loans Online
Mortgage credit
Fast loans
Non-purpose loan
Leasing
guarantor for the loan
Potroƶacki credit
loans for unemployed
loan for craftsmen
consolidation loan
other investments
2% interest rate, both long and short term cash
reply to us (Whats App) number: +919394133968 patialalegitimate515@gmail.com
Mr Jeffery