Friday, February 28, 2014
Ky. gay-marriage ruling a case of judiciary usurping voters' say
4 comments:
You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:
1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.
The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.
Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.
Six comments at the moment (at the Leader), none of them agreeing with your nonsense.
ReplyDeleteThe times, they are a' changin'...
I will have to admit: you're way of deciding issues (counting heads on the comments section of a famously liberal newspaper that has lost most of its conservative readership and which is having trouble staying afloat financially) does have the advantage of simplicity.
ReplyDelete'I will have to admit: you're way of deciding issues (counting heads on the comments section of a famously liberal newspaper that has lost most of its conservative readership and which is having trouble staying afloat financially) does have the advantage of simplicity.'
ReplyDeleteAs opposed to your way of settling federal constitutional issues by referencing in-state popular votes from 10 years ago?
I see...
The constitutional issue is whether there is a legitimate constitutional issue with the vote ten years ago.
ReplyDeleteBut if we're counting heads, yeah, 1,222,125 is a little bigger than, what did you say? Six?