Tuesday, March 04, 2014

Stupid argument of the day

Get this: Dan Canon, the lawyer for the plaintiffs in the Bourke v. Beshear--the case that Jack Conway bailed on today, is criticizing Beshear for continuing the appeal of the case on the grounds that it will cost the state money.

Uh, if state spending is what he is worried about, then why did he sue the state in the first place? Wouldn't it have cost the state less money if it didn't have to defend itself from a suit by his clients?

Sheeez.
at

1 comment:

  1. KyCobb7:55 PM

    The state shouldn't spend taxpayer money in support of unconstitutional discrimination. People shouldn't have to accept second-class citizenship in order to save the state money.

    ReplyDelete

You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:

1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.

The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.

Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.