Wednesday, June 25, 2014
Roadmap for an Argument for the Existence of God
4 comments:
You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:
1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.
The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.
Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.
"Larry And His Magic _____", an alleged musician (also portrayed by Spencer) whose various appearances featured a series of different instruments. His call-and-response act featured him proclaiming, "I'm gonna play my (trumpet, fiddle, xylophone, kettle drum, accordion, etc.)" and the audience shouting back, "Whatcha gonna do?" This exchange would be repeated twice, after which he would announce, "I'm gonna play my (instrument) nowwww!" Instead of playing, though, he would merely repeat his audience-punctuated declaration. After a few verses of this, the skit would inevitably end with Spencer failing to play his instrument. Either time would run out, the instrument would malfunction or be booby-trapped, or he would manage to produce a few inept notes before being permanently interrupted by Barris.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous,
ReplyDeleteIf you are too anxious to wait for the imminent posts on this topic, you could obtain a copy of the same argument in the books by Robert Spitzer or W. Norris Clarke that I mentioned.
You do, I presume, know how to request a book from the library.
Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteI find it ironic that, after implicitly criticizing Thomas for not producing his conclusion (knowing that the post is only a part of a series), you don't bother to draw the implicit inference of your own post.
Is this comment a part of a series you intend to complete?
Watcha gonna do?
ReplyDelete