"There is a limit to the democratic process,"
―Laura Landenwich, Louisville, Kentucky, attorney representing same-sex couples wanting to redefine marriage.
Glad we got that cleared up.
Thursday, August 07, 2014
Same-Sex Marriage Advocates Take Off the Mask: Takeaway line from yesterday's oral arguments before the 6th Circuit
2 comments:
You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:
1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.
The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.
Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.
Well yes there is Martin. For example, if a majority of Kentucky voters decided you could not be married, I bet you wouldn't just shrug your shoulders and say goodbye to your wife. A real life example is that voters can't ban mixed race marriages. Are you saying voters should be able to ban mixed race marriages, or your own marriage, because there should be no limits to the democratic process?
ReplyDeleteYes, and I would like to marry my cousin's 7 year old. No, now I would like to marry my cat. I have a committed relationship. It's all relative. Why not?
ReplyDelete