Thursday, October 02, 2014

Anthony Esolen on the Intolerance of the New Secular Theocracy

Anthony Esolen, in Crisis Magazine, on the New Intolerance:
The “faith” of no faith moved Stalin to murder his millions in the Ukraine, and Mao to murder his tens of millions throughout the vast rural territories of China.  Secularism is a bloody business, because, without God, man is affixed to the terrible adverb “only,” and there is very little you cannot do to someone who is “only” a counter in an economic tally, or a pawn in a vast historical battlefield, or an organic machine consuming food and water, or whatever.
Read more here.

2 comments:

  1. KyCobb8:26 AM

    Since when is Marxism "new"? It is its own weird secular religion, with a prophet and a promised utopia. The belief in a higher purpose leading to an ultimate good is what enables people to kill unbelievers, not atheism. Otherwise,how does one explain jihad in the Middle East, or the terrorist acts committed by rightwing Christians in the US? In my view, as I am not ensnared in an ideology like Christianity or Marxism, there is no higher purpose which justifies killing an innocent person. It is those ideologies which dehumanize individuals as unworthy unbelievers, not atheism. Each persons' life is its own highest purpose, and society should strive to maximize happiness of the broadest range of people possible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Mr. Cobb,

    First you say, "The belief in a higher purpose leading to an ultimate good is what enables people to kill unbelievers."

    Then you say, "Each persons' life is its own highest purpose, and society should strive to maximize happiness of the broadest range of people possible."

    It would be interesting to compare the number of murders committed in the U.S. for religious reasons verses those committed because someone saw their own life as the highest good.

    ReplyDelete

You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:

1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.

The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.

Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.