Let me get this straight: We're going to do away with the First Amendment right to freely exercise our religion (which actually is in the Constitution) so that gays can exercise their right to have flowers provided for them by Christian florists (which is not in the Constitution)?
Really?
If I am hearing the critics of Indiana's new religious freedom law rightly, it is apparently so hard for gays to find flowers for their weddings that we must track down the evil florists who refuse to endorse their weddings and punish them.
You can go down the road and easily find another florist. What road do you go down to find another First Amendment protection?
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are welcome to post at this blog. You are asked, however, to refrain from the following:
1. Name-calling;
2. Questioning the motives or integrity of people you have never met just because you disagree with them;
3. Using obscenities or other expressions not appropriate or necessary to civilized discussion;
4. Taking disagreement personally;
5. Demeaning or insulting remarks.
The host will attempt to abide by the same rules and only asks that you not provide him with the temptation to do so in return by violating them.
Failure to comply with these rules can result (depending solely on the arbitrary and inscrutable will of the host) in the deletion of offending posts and suspension of posting privileges. Such measures are more likely if you post anonymously.