It opened this time. Whew! You are correct; the historian/author drifted into eugenics and Nazi's. I wonder who would change their mind after reading the article. Perhaps this article is one step above Martin's postings on evolution.
The comparison to eugenics in Germany (no specific mention of Nazis, however) is in the context of a remark about scientists rushing to judgment concerning things about which they don't have sufficient evidence.
I'll mark you all down as being in favor of science rushing to judgment.
Keep that careful analysis and critical thinking coming boys!
5 comments:
I couldn't get the link to open. I assume it is a climate scientist presenting their ideas in a scientific journal?
Close :-) I can send you a copy if you want; it is a newspaper article and invokes the Nazis - I'm not sure you need any more than that.
jah
It opened this time. Whew! You are correct; the historian/author drifted into eugenics and Nazi's. I wonder who would change their mind after reading the article. Perhaps this article is one step above Martin's postings on evolution.
The comparison to eugenics in Germany (no specific mention of Nazis, however) is in the context of a remark about scientists rushing to judgment concerning things about which they don't have sufficient evidence.
I'll mark you all down as being in favor of science rushing to judgment.
Keep that careful analysis and critical thinking coming boys!
MC: (no specific mention of Nazis, however)
Come on, admit it, Mr Cothran, you're just playing the straight man (except when it comes to homosexuals) (unintentional pun)
MC's link: "In fact, when the Nazis"
MC: is the problem of simple reading comprehension becoming a sort of theme
jah
Post a Comment